Tax

US tax reform: one year in

In December 2017, US lawmakers enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the country’s biggest overhaul of tax legislation for a generation – you’ll have to go back to 1986 for anything as far-reaching. The impact on corporate earnings and investment plans are appearing significant and further opportunities are unfolding. However, a year on from being passed in Congress, the legislation is still subject to considerable interpretation.

Read the full article to see how US tax reform is making an impact a year on [ 141 kb ].

Far reaching tax reform

By any measure, the TCJA is a game-changer. The impact reaches beyond tax management to business planning, operating structures and market competition.

The headline shift is the reduction in the US federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. While this monumental cut makes the US rate more competitive, it by no means makes it the lowest in the G7. Moreover, the TCJA closes a number of exemptions, which may mean that the gain isn’t quite as big as the 14% cut would imply.

Just as far-reaching is bringing the US’ international tax regime broadly into line with other major economies. Having now moved to a ‘quasi-territorial’ system, in which tax is paid where the money is made subject to some guardrails to prevent abuse. This levels the playing field with major international competitors.

The TCJA has given corporations an opportunity to repatriate funds held abroad free of future US tax (after a transition ‘toll tax’ payment). Further relief comes from a ‘participation exemption’ on tax on dividend income from foreign subsidiaries. While such an exemption is another move towards the international centre of gravity of taxation, the US qualification threshold of a 10% stake is noticeably lower than the standard 25%.

Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI)

The main counterweight to the territorial system is the GILTI, which is an anti-deferral measure designed to prevent companies from shifting profits on mobile income (eg royalty payments) to low tax jurisdictions by imposing a 13.125% tax floor on tax paid outside the US.

The concept of a minimum tax can also be seen in the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT), which seeks to deter corporations from making excessive tax-deductible expense payments to foreign affiliates. BEAT has significant implications for transfer pricing, with the risk of double taxation heightened by the lack of a credit for tax paid outside the US on these payments.

Has the reform delivered its objectives?

As well as simplify the tax system, the TCJA is designed to boost the US economy and encourage the creation of high paid jobs.

There is little sign of a simplified tax system; further grey areas and multi-step calculations by imposing one set of highly complex legislation on an already complex set of tax statutes.

There have been positive signs on the economy. How much of this is down to the tax cuts and whether the gains are sustainable are hard to gauge with any certainty at this stage. What is not in doubt is that a $1.5 trillion tax cut gives US corporations a significant edge when competing with MNEs from other jurisdictions.

Time to capitalise on the potential opportunities?

We see that there are four ways you can get to grips with the changes:

Update your tax model - The way your entities, transfer pricing and cost-sharing arrangements have been structured from a tax perspective are likely to reflect a system that has now been superseded. How does your operating structure now look from a tax efficiency perspective? Are you still getting the benefits you had before? How can you bring structures and supply chain arrangements up to date?

Re-evaluate capital structure - We’re already seeing a greater willingness to deploy capital in the US in search of better returns. The flipside includes re-evaluating the use of debt in light of the limits on interest rate deductibility. For private equity, the treatment of certain leveraged structures may be potentially less favourable than before.

Moreover, while before, it was common practice to borrow money in the US and lend this to the rest of the group, the tighter deductibility criteria could mean that it makes more sense to access credit outside the US. The shifting targets in this area are causing taxpayers to align borrowing with profit generating activities.

Make your voice count - If the devil is in the detail, then it’s important to work out what proposed interpretations of the legislation mean for your business and have your say as part of the consultation process. This will be ongoing.

Work out how to manage the increased compliance demands - The TCJA imposes significant extra demands on data gathering, calculation and filing, much of which needs to be carried out quarterly. If we look at GILTI, for example, your business would need to carry out calculations and returns for every subsidiary. If the amount of information in a US tax return might have been 5-6 pages per entity, we are now typically looking at 12-15. Are your systems, processes and controls up to speed?

On the front foot

The TCJA has the potential to deliver higher earnings and more cash for investment. Yet, there is a lot of hard work required to realise the benefits, along with systematic reviews of systems, technology and processes to ensure compliance.

Whether you’re a US-based MNE or you’re an MNE with operations in the US, it’s important to get on the front foot by assessing the impact on your structures and how you can manage this. It’s also important to look at the TCJA as part of a wider review of whether current tax management is fit for purpose, with the US reforms providing the catalyst for possible system modernisation.

If you would like to discuss any of the areas raised, please contact David Sites, Grant Thornton US or your local Grant Thornton adviser.