-
Business consulting services
Our business consulting services can help you improve your operational performance and productivity, adding value throughout your growth life cycle.
-
Business process solutions
We can help you identify, understand and manage potential risks to safeguard your business and comply with regulatory requirements.
-
Business risk services
The relationship between a company and its auditor has changed. Organisations must understand and manage risk and seek an appropriate balance between risk and opportunities.
-
Cybersecurity
As organisations become increasingly dependent on digital technology, the opportunities for cyber criminals continue to grow.
-
Forensic and investigation services
At Grant Thornton, we have a wealth of knowledge in forensic services and can support you with issues such as dispute resolution, fraud and insurance claims.
-
Mergers and acquisitions
Globalisation and company growth ambitions are driving an increase in M&A activity worldwide. We work with entrepreneurial businesses in the mid-market to help them assess the true commercial potential of their planned acquisition and understand how the purchase might serve their longer- term strategic goals.
-
Recovery and reorganisation
Workable solutions to maximise your value and deliver sustainable recovery
-
Transactional advisory services
We can support you throughout the transaction process – helping achieve the best possible outcome at the point of the transaction and in the longer term.
-
Valuations
We provide a wide range of services to recovery and reorganisation professionals, companies and their stakeholders.

-
IFRS
The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are a set of global accounting standards developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) for the preparation of public company financial statements. At Grant Thornton, our IFRS advisers can help you navigate the complexity of financial reporting from IFRS 1 to IFRS 17 and IAS 1 to IAS 41.
-
Audit quality monitoring
Having a robust process of quality control is one of the most effective ways to guarantee we deliver high-quality services to our clients.
-
Global audit technology
We apply our global audit methodology through an integrated set of software tools known as the Voyager suite.

-
Corporate and business tax
Our trusted teams can prepare corporate tax files and ruling requests, support you with deferrals, accounting procedures and legitimate tax benefits.
-
Direct international tax
Our teams have in-depth knowledge of the relationship between domestic and international tax laws.
-
Global mobility services
Through our global organisation of member firms, we support both companies and individuals, providing insightful solutions to minimise the tax burden for both parties.
-
Indirect international tax
Using our finely tuned local knowledge, teams from our global organisation of member firms help you understand and comply with often complex and time-consuming regulations.
-
Transfer pricing
The laws surrounding transfer pricing are becoming ever more complex, as tax affairs of multinational companies are facing scrutiny from media, regulators and the public

-
Outsourcing Changes to the Outsourcing legislation, specifically when offshoringSignificant changes to the dynamic of the financial services sector in recent years have shifted the paradigms in how we work. The increased digitisation of the workforce, changes in business models, globalisation, and remote working capabilities have led to a new approach to the delivery of services.
-
Asset management Inflation and tax planningThe recent onset of rapid inflation is an unwelcome development that is having a widespread impact on US businesses and tax planning.

This article sets out the requirements for recognising and measuring any non-controlling interest (NCI).
Definition of NCI
NCI is the term used in IFRS 3 and IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ to describe equity instruments of a subsidiary not held directly or indirectly by a parent. In a business combination, a NCI arises when an entity acquires less than 100% of the equity of the acquiree.
Definition
-
IFRS 3 defines NCI as ‘the equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent’
The simplest and most common form of NCI is shares in the acquiree held by non-selling shareholders. However, all instruments issued by the acquiree that meet the definition of equity set out in IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’ – such as some share options, preferred shares, equity component of convertible bonds, etc – are also NCI if they are not owned or acquired by the acquirer. It is therefore important to identify and distinguish the acquiree’s equity instruments from its financial liabilities based on the definitions in IAS 32. This is because NCI is presented as a separate component of equity in the acquirer’s post-combination consolidated financial statements and is subsequently accounted for in accordance with IFRS 10.
Category of NCI and measurement option
Depending on the nature and the rights those equity instruments entitle their holders, NCI can be grouped into two broad categories, which in turn determine the available measurement options at initial recognition. Determining whether a NCI measurement option is available is key when accounting for a business combination, since the measurement of NCI can affect the amount of goodwill and subsequent accounting.
Category | Description | Measurement option |
Present ownership instruments | Acquiree’s shares held by non-selling shareholders that are present ownership interest and entitle them to a proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets in the event of liquidation (eg common or ordinary shares). | Measured either at fair value (fair value model) or proportionate share of recognised amount of assets and liabilities of the acquiree (proportionate interest model).
The choice between the two measurement options is to be made for each business combination on a transaction-bytransaction basis, rather than being a policy choice applicable to all business combinations. |
All other equity instruments not held directly or indirectly by the acquirer |
Financial instruments issued by the acquiree other than those covered by the first category above that meet IAS 32’s definition of equity (eg warrants or stock options on ‘fixed-for-fixed’ terms and non-mandatorily redeemable preferred shares that do not entitle its holder to a proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets in the event of liquidation). | Measured at fair value, unless another measurement basis is required by IFRS eg share-based payment awards classified as equity and held by parties other than the acquirer are measured in accordance with IFRS 2 ‘Share-Based Payment’. |
These measurement options are only available on initial recognition of a NCI, as part of a business combination transaction, in order to determine the amount of goodwill. Once initially recognised in accordance with IFRS 3, IFRS 10 guidance on subsequent accounting should be applied.
Present ownership instruments – NCI measurement options impact
The basis on which NCI of which are present ownership instruments is initially measured, affects goodwill at the acquisition date but could also have a financial impact on subsequent impairment and transactions with those NCI. When the fair value model is used, 100% of the goodwill in the acquiree is recognised (both the acquirer’s and the NCI’s share). This is sometimes described as the full goodwill model. Under the proportionate interest model only the acquirer’s interest in the goodwill is recognised (a lesser amount).
The following example shows the basic effect of the two models:
Example – Measuring NCI
Entity A pays CU800 for an 80% interest in Entity B. Entity A does not have any previously held equity interest in Entity B. The fair value of Entity B’s identifiable net assets is estimated to be CU750. Using a valuation technique, the fair value of the remaining 20% in Entity B (the NCI) on the acquisition date is determined to be CU180. The NCI gives right to a present ownership interest in the acquiree’s equity.
Analysis
The amount of NCI and goodwill recognised under the alternative methods is as follows:
Fair Value Model CU |
Proportionate interest model CU |
|
Cash consideration | 800 | 800 |
NCI at fair value | 180 | - |
NCI at 20% of identifiable net assets* | - | 150 |
Total | 980 | 950 |
Fair value of 100% of identifiable net assets | 750 | 750 |
Goodwill | 230 | 200 |
Recognised amount of NCI | 180 | 150 |
* The proportionate share of NCI in the identifiable net assets is determined as follows: CU750 * 20 % = CU150. |
Apart from the effect on goodwill, other factors may influence the measurement model choice, download 'Recognising and measuring non-controlling interests' for more.
Determining the fair value of NCI
Fair value of NCI should be measured in accordance with IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’. Refer to our article Insights into IFRS 3 – How are the identifiable assets and liabilities measured? which provides some guidance on how to determine fair value in accordance with IFRS 13.

How should the identifiable assets and liabilities be measured?
IFRS 3 provides however some guidance on how the fair value of NCI is determined when applicable:
Fair value of NCI
- The fair value of NCI is based on the quoted price in an active market for the equity shares not held by the acquirer, if available. Otherwise, the acquirer would measure the fair value of NCI using other valuation techniques.
- The fair value of the acquirer’s interest and NCI in the acquiree on a per-share basis might differ and as such it might not be relevant to etain the acquirer fair value per share to determine the fair value of NCI as the fair value per share of the acquirer’s interest in the acquiree is likely to include a control premium or conversely, the fair value of the NCI might include a discount for lack of control (also referred to as a NCI discount).
Call and put options on NCI
The acquirer may arrange with non-selling shareholders during the period of negotiation for the acquisition to acquire NCI shares after the acquisition date – eg by entering into put or call options or a forward contract over the remaining shares held by the non-selling shareholders of the acquiree. An analysis is then required to determine whether, in substance, the underlying shares still legally owned by the NCI are economically attributable to non-selling shareholders or to the acquirer. This analysis and its consequences on the acquisition accounting is discussed further in our article Insights into IFRS 3 – Determining what is part of a business combination transaction.
How we can help
We hope you find the information in this article helpful in giving you some insight into IFRS 3. If you would like to discuss any of the points raised, please speak to your usual Grant Thornton contact or your local member firm.