Business consulting services
Our business consulting services can help you improve your operational performance and productivity, adding value throughout your growth life cycle.
Business process solutions
We can help you identify, understand and manage potential risks to safeguard your business and comply with regulatory requirements.
Business risk services
The relationship between a company and its auditor has changed. Organisations must understand and manage risk and seek an appropriate balance between risk and opportunities.
As organisations become increasingly dependent on digital technology, the opportunities for cyber criminals continue to grow.
Forensic and investigation services
At Grant Thornton, we have a wealth of knowledge in forensic services and can support you with issues such as dispute resolution, fraud and insurance claims.
Mergers and acquisitions
Globalisation and company growth ambitions are driving an increase in M&A activity worldwide. We work with entrepreneurial businesses in the mid-market to help them assess the true commercial potential of their planned acquisition and understand how the purchase might serve their longer- term strategic goals.
Recovery and reorganisation
Workable solutions to maximise your value and deliver sustainable recovery
Transactional advisory services
We can support you throughout the transaction process – helping achieve the best possible outcome at the point of the transaction and in the longer term.
We provide a wide range of services to recovery and reorganisation professionals, companies and their stakeholders.
The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are a set of global accounting standards developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) for the preparation of public company financial statements. At Grant Thornton, our IFRS advisers can help you navigate the complexity of financial reporting from IFRS 1 to IFRS 17 and IAS 1 to IAS 41.
Audit quality monitoring
Having a robust process of quality control is one of the most effective ways to guarantee we deliver high-quality services to our clients.
Global audit technology
We apply our global audit methodology through an integrated set of software tools known as the Voyager suite.
Corporate and business tax
Our trusted teams can prepare corporate tax files and ruling requests, support you with deferrals, accounting procedures and legitimate tax benefits.
Direct international tax
Our teams have in-depth knowledge of the relationship between domestic and international tax laws.
Global mobility services
Through our global organisation of member firms, we support both companies and individuals, providing insightful solutions to minimise the tax burden for both parties.
Indirect international tax
Using our finely tuned local knowledge, teams from our global organisation of member firms help you understand and comply with often complex and time-consuming regulations.
Innovation and investment incentives
Dynamic businesses must continually innovate to maintain competitiveness, evolve and grow. Valuable tax reliefs are available to support innovative activities, irrespective of your tax profile.
Private client services
Our solutions include dealing with emigration and tax mitigation on the income and capital growth of overseas assets.
The laws surrounding transfer pricing are becoming ever more complex, as tax affairs of multinational companies are facing scrutiny from media, regulators and the public
Tax policies are constantly evolving and there are a number of complex changes on the horizon that could significantly affect your business.
Effective from 1 January 2019, IFRS 16 ‘Leasing’, brings fundamental changes to lease accounting that replace previous accounting that is considered no longer fit for purpose. IFRS 16 - Interim periods [ 63 kb ] looks into how you treat a variable lease payment in the financial statements of an interim period.
IFRS 16 must first be applied to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, including interim periods beginning on or after that date. The application of IFRS 16 to those interim periods will broadly follow the requirements of IFRS 16 except in one key respect.
Download this article
IFRS 16 requires a variable lease payment, provided it is not in-substance fixed or based on an index or rate, to be recognised in profit or loss in the period in which the triggering event or condition occurs. Therefore, you might assume that the same would apply in interim periods. In other words, a variable lease payment would only be recognised in the interim period in which the event that crystallises the payment occurs.
However, IAS 34.B7 requires a variable lease payment to be recognised if it is expected that the event will occur before the end of the current annual reporting period.
This appears to be a direct conflict between the two Standards.
In our view, when preparing a set of interim financial statements under IAS 34, the IAS 34 approach should be taken to ensure the interim financial statements are compliant with IAS 34. However, given the evident conflict, it is not possible to entirely rule out an IFRS 16 approach.
Entity A has a December year-end and leases a high street store. As well as making fixed lease payments each year, Entity A is required to make a further lease payment of £100,000 every year the store makes sales of at least £10 million. Considering both IFRS 16 and IAS 34 when should a liability be recognised for the additional £100,000 payment? Assume Entity A reports on a six-monthly basis.
IFRS 16 will only require recognition of that additional lease payment in any annual reporting period if the triggering event, ie sales of at least £10 million, has occurred.
However, in its first interim financial statements to 30 June 2019, Entity A must assess whether it expects the store to make sales of at least £10 million before the end of the year. In our view, the entity should apply an IAS 34 approach and recognise a liability for the additional payment if it expects the threshold to be met.
IAS 34 does not specify whether or not the expense can be pro-rated, ie whether the expense can be based on the proportion of the target sales recognised to date or on a time apportionment basis. Given the lack of specific guidance on this point management will need to exercise their judgement in selecting an appropriate accounting policy.
Entity A has a December year-end and leases a high street store for a four-year period. As well as making fixed lease payments each year, Entity A is required to make a further lease payment in year four of £200,000 if the store makes sales of at least £10 million over the first three years.
At the start of the lease, Entity A believes the threshold will be exceeded at some point in the third year and therefore the amount will be payable. The liability is triggered in October of the third year. Considering both IFRS 16 and IAS 34 when should a liability be made for the £100,000 additional payment?
As with example 1 above, IFRS 16 will only require recognition of that additional lease payment in any annual reporting period if the triggering event, ie sales of at least £10 million, has occurred. This means the payment will be recorded in year 3 when the sales exceed £10 million.
However, in our view, IAS 34 will require Entity A to begin recognising a provision in the first interim period of the third year.
For both scenarios it is important to note that IAS 34 is a Standard relating to interim reports only and therefore should not influence how IFRS 16 is applied to the year-end financial report.
We hope you find the information in this article helpful in giving you some detail into aspects of IFRS 16. If you would like to discuss any of the points raised, please speak to your usual Grant Thornton contact or your local member firm.