• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
You are currently in the Global version of the Grant Thornton website. Would you like to visit our United States website?
Go to:
grantthornton.com
  • About us
    • Why Grant Thornton
    • Culture and experience
    • Global scale and capability
    • Leadership, governance and quality
    • Meet our International Business Centre Directors
    • Join our network
  • Global locations
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Middle East
  • Services
    • Advisory
      • Advisory
      • Business consulting services
      • Business process solutions
      • Business risk services
      • Cybersecurity
      • Forensic services
      • Mergers and acquisitions
      • Recovery and reorganisation
      • Transactional advisory services
      • Valuations
      • Sustainability advisory
    • Assurance
      • Assurance
      • IFRS
      • Audit quality monitoring
      • Global audit technology
      • Sustainability assurance
    • Tax
      • Tax
      • Corporate and business tax
      • Direct international tax
      • Global mobility services
      • Indirect international tax
      • Transfer pricing
      • Africa tax desk
      • Sustainability tax
  • Industries
    • Asset management
    • Automotive
    • Banking
    • Business services
    • Energy and natural resources
    • Healthcare
    • Insurance
    • Life sciences
    • Media
    • Not for profit
    • Private equity
    • Public sector
    • Real estate and construction
    • Retail
    • Technology
    • Telecommunications
    • Travel, tourism and leisure
  • Topics
    • Latest insights
      • Latest insights
      • Thriving through disruption
      • Scaling sustainability
      • CFO success: Inspiring change in female mid-market leadership
      • Trade in transition
      • Navigating tariffs
      • Women in Business 2025
    • Growing internationally
      • Growing internationally
      • Thriving through disruption
      • Trade in transition
      • Navigating tariffs
      • Top five constraints to international business in the mid-market
      • Brand and international marketing – breaking global barriers
      • The key to international business: Investing in people
      • Building resilience in international business
      • International business: Mid-market growth and expansion
    • Diversity, equity and inclusion
      • Diversity, equity and inclusion
      • CFO success: Inspiring change in female mid-market leadership
      • Women in Business 2025: Impacting the missed generation
      • Women in tech: A pathway to gender balance in top tech roles
      • Women in leadership: A pathway to better performance
      • Women in Business 2024: Pathways to parity
      • Women in Business 2023: The push for parity
    • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Scaling sustainability
      • The journey to a sustainable future
      • Promoting ESG excellence through tax
      • Understanding the impact of environmental taxes
      • Engaging with incentives to drive your ESG goals
      • Transparency and tax governance in the ESG era
    • International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
      • International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
      • Example Financial Statements
      • IFRS 8
      • IFRS 16
      • IAS 36
      • IFRS 17
    • Tax
      • Tax
      • Pillar 2
      • Global expatriate tax guide
      • International indirect tax guide
      • Global transfer pricing guide
  1. Home
  2. Press releases
  3. 2012
  4. The debate over levels of CEO remuneration

The debate over levels of CEO remuneration

08 Aug 2012

The debate over levels of CEO remuneration

Regulations and red tape greatest constraint to business growth

Two-thirds (67%) of business leaders around the world say that shareholders should have greater involvement in establishing remuneration policy for senior executives at large public companies and 66% believe that senior executives are paid too much, according to a global survey of 3,000 businesses in 40 countries.

More than three-quarters (77%) say that public companies should disclose the remuneration policy and individual remuneration of executive and non-executive directors and 80% believe that the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board be held by different people to ensure greater oversight.

The survey was conducted by Experian in May and June 2012 as part of the Grant Thornton International Business Report, a quarterly global business survey of public and private businesses, now in its twentieth year.

In your opinion, are senior executives at large public companies paid too much?
66% yes
27% no

Should public companies disclose the remuneration policy and individual remuneration of executive and non-executive directors?
77% yes
19% no

Should shareholders have greater involvement in establishing remuneration policy for senior executives at large public companies?
67% yes
28% no

Should the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board be held by different people to ensure greater oversight?
80% yes
14% no

In your opinion, should executive remuneration at public companies be closely linked to performance targets?
90% yes
7% no

For further information please contact:

John Vita 

Director of Public Relations and External Affairs

T +1 312 602 8955

 

Share this page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Xing
  • Email

Connect Connect

  • Meet our people
  • Contact us
  • Global reach

About About

  • About us
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Modern slavery statement
  • GPPC

Legal Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Site map
  • Unauthorised trademark use
  • Transparency report 2024
  • Cookie Preferences

Services Services

  • Advisory
  • Assurance
  • Tax

Follow usFollow us

© 2025 Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL) - All rights reserved. "Grant Thornton” refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions.