This article discusses how to identify the date of acquisition or the date the business combination is affected.
Our ‘Insights into IFRS 3’ summarises key areas of the Standard, highlighting aspects that are more difficult to interpret and revisits the most relevant features impacting your business.
This article should be read closely with our other ‘identification’ articles:
IFRS 3 defines the acquisition date as the date the acquirer obtains control of the acquiree. In a combination effected by a sale and purchase agreement, this is generally the specified closing or completion date (the date when the consideration is transferred and acquiree shares or underlying net assets are acquired).
The acquisition date is critical because it determines when the acquirer recognises and measures the consideration transferred, the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed. The acquiree’s results are consolidated from this date. The acquisition date materially impacts the overall acquisition accounting, including post-combination earnings.
The acquisition date is often readily apparent from the structure of the business combination and the terms of the sale and purchase agreement (if applicable) but this is not always the case. Complications can arise because of the many ways, both contractual and non-contractual, that business combinations can be put together.
For convenience an entity might wish to designate an acquisition date of the end (or the beginning) of a month, the date on which it closes its books, rather than the actual acquisition date (ie a date during the month). Unless events between the ‘convenience’ date and the actual acquisition date result in material changes in the amounts recognised, that entity’s practice would comply with the requirements of the Standard as noted in the Basis for Conclusions to IFRS 3.
The period between the start of negotiations and final settlement of all aspects of a combination can be protracted. Applicable corporate laws, shareholder approval requirements, competition rules and stock market regulations also vary and may affect the analysis and the date at which control is transferred to the acquirer.
Because no two business combination transactions are identical, there are few (if any) ‘rules of thumb’ to assist in identifying the acquisition date. Instead, the definition of control should be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each situation. Judgement will often be required, and disclosure of the assessment made will need to be fully disclosed under the requirements of IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’.
1. The purchase agreement specifies that control is transferred on an effective date different from the closing date
Consider whether the provisional effective date actually changes the acquisition date. In practice, many of these types of provisions are simply mechanisms to adjust the price but may not affect the date when control is obtained.
An agreement that artificially backdates the date of acquisition cannot justify the acquisition date (from an accounting perspective) being the earlier date. In other words, it cannot be subsequently decided that control took place at a date when the acquirer and the acquiree were unlikely having any relationship. Control cannot be decided afterwards on the basis of a contractual term that artificially places the acquisition date before the terms of the contract provided the acquirer with the benefits associated of returns from that date.
2. The purchase is complete subject to shareholder approval
Consider the date when the acquirer can effect change in the board of directors of the acquiree.
Until the approval is obtained it would be difficult to consider that control has been transferred.
3. The purchase is complete subject to regulatory approval
Consider whether the date of regulatory approval is merely a formality.
For example, a target company operates in a market and jurisdiction where the acquirer is already a significant competitor. Where this transaction requires the approval of the competition authority in that jurisdiction, it would be difficult to conclude this regulatory approval is just a formality. Therefore, until the approval is obtained, control cannot have been transferred to the acquirer.
4. No closing date specified
Consider, for example, when an investee repurchases own shares held by other investors resulting in an existing shareholder becoming a majority shareholder. In this case, the starting point is to identify the date when the shareholder's proportionate voting rights amounted to a controlling interest.
5. Made by public offer
Consider the date a public offer becomes unconditional (with a controlling interest acquired).
6. The purchase is complete subject to other conditions
Consider the date when the acquirer starts directing the acquiree's operating and financing policies.
We hope you find the information in this article helpful in giving you some insight into IFRS 3. If you would like to discuss any of the points raised, please speak to your usual Grant Thornton contact or your local member firm.
Now more than ever the need for businesses, their auditors and any other accounting advisors to work closely together is essential. Subscribe below and we will share our latest insights into International Financial Reporting Standards with you.
Thanks for subscribing. We look forward to keeping you updated with the latest insights.
